The decision desk
AI search visibility tools: Peec AI vs OtterlyAI vs Profound
Compare Peec AI, OtterlyAI, and Profound for monitoring brand mentions, understanding cited sources, and finding opportunities in AI search answers.
Our take
Peec AI fits focused brand and competitor analytics, OtterlyAI offers a small-prompt entry plan with audits, and Profound connects visibility research with a broader AI marketing platform.
The quick difference
3 tools, at a glance
Start with the fit. Read the individual breakdowns below before choosing. Scroll the table on smaller screens.
| Tool | Best fit | Main strengths | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peec AI | Marketing teams comparing brand visibility across a chosen prompt set and AI platforms. | Daily prompt tracking across selected models · Competitor, sentiment, and source analysis · Prompt suggestions and opportunities informed by AI answers | Starter includes three selected models and one project. |
| OtterlyAI | Small marketing teams establishing a recurring view of brand presence in AI answers. | Daily tracking and brand visibility reports · Citation analysis and GEO page audits · Standard and higher API, MCP, and agent analytics | Lite covers only 15 prompts and one workspace. |
| Profound | Brands combining AI search measurement with a broader marketing research and execution platform. | Answer Engine Insights for mentions, citations, and competitors · Prompt Volumes and Agent Analytics · AI Marketer and reusable workflows using brand context | Brand trial prompts are recommended and cannot be customized. |
Compare pricing, features, and source dates
Prices describe the named plan, not total cost. Different billing units are not directly equivalent. Scroll the table horizontally on smaller screens.
| At a glance | Peec AIVendor documentation | OtterlyAIVendor documentation | ProfoundVendor documentation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consider it for | Marketing teams comparing brand visibility across a chosen prompt set and AI platforms. | Small marketing teams establishing a recurring view of brand presence in AI answers. | Brands combining AI search measurement with a broader marketing research and execution platform. |
| Named plan / entry point | Starter $95/month USD/month | Lite $29/month USD/month | Enterprise custom quote contract plus agent credits |
| Free option | No ongoing free plan | No ongoing free plan | No ongoing free plan |
| Documented features |
|
|
|
| Limitations |
|
|
|
| Integrations | Check the official product documentation | Check the official product documentation | Check the official product documentation |
| Billing details | The live monthly cards show Starter $95, Pro $245, and Advanced $495. Starter includes 50 prompts, three selected models, one project, daily tracking, and unlimited users; Pro has 150 prompts/two projects and Advanced 350/five. Annual billing advertises a 15% discount; exact annual invoice totals were not confirmed. Extra models cost more. A free trial is distinct from recurring free access. | Monthly prices are Lite $29 for 15 prompts, Standard $189 for 100, and Premium $489 for 400. The annual view displays monthly equivalents of $25, $160, and $422 respectively. Included engines are ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, and Microsoft Copilot; other engines are add-ons. A trial is offered. Free GEO tools do not establish a permanent free monitoring plan. | The current For brands offer has a free trial and custom Enterprise. Trial runs 50 prompts daily for seven days across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews, with limited AI Marketer credits and no history, exports, or API. Enterprise includes ongoing tracking and tailored coverage up to nine engines. Fixed fees, contract term, and agent credit rates are unconfirmed; agency offers are separately scoped. |
| Last checked | Sep 29, 2026 Official source | Sep 29, 2026 Official source | Sep 29, 2026 Official source |
Peec AI
Peec AI tracks how brands appear in answers to a selected set of prompts. Its analytics look at visibility, answer position, sentiment, competitors, and the sources behind responses, giving marketers a view of more than a simple mention count. A team can investigate which topics surface its brand, where competitors appear instead, and which domains or pages contribute to those answers. Prompt suggestions and brand context help organize that monitoring around relevant questions. Peec also has reporting and action-oriented features, including source gaps and opportunities based on the tracked data. That makes it a useful shortlist option for an SEO or content team that wants AI search analysis to become a recurring part of its planning. The plan structure scales through prompt counts, projects, and model coverage while allowing unlimited users. Our assessment is that its strongest fit is collaborative brand and competitor analysis, with the important boundary that the results describe the chosen prompts and supported platforms, not all possible AI conversations.
OtterlyAI
OtterlyAI combines daily AI answer monitoring with tools for understanding citations and identifying optimization work. It tracks brand presence across included search engines, produces brand reports, and analyzes the links appearing in answers. Its prompt research and GEO audits add a practical next step for marketers who want to connect a visibility change with pages they could improve. The Lite plan starts with a relatively small prompt allowance, which makes it relevant to a solo marketer or small business watching a focused set of buying questions. Higher plans broaden capacity and add features such as API and MCP access, agent analytics, and Looker Studio reporting. Workspace limits also change with the tier, an important distinction for teams managing several brands. OtterlyAI's appeal is a compact starting point with both monitoring and audit functions. Its model coverage needs attention: the included engines and optional paid additions are explicitly separated, so the entry price should not be interpreted as access to every supported AI platform.
Profound
Profound brings AI answer measurement into a broader marketing platform. Answer Engine Insights analyzes brand mentions, citations, sentiment, and competitive presence, while Prompt Volumes adds a separate view of demand and Agent Analytics examines AI-related visits and activity. The wider product includes AI Marketer, brand context, and reusable agents for marketing work. That combination is relevant to teams that want research, measurement, and execution in a connected environment rather than a single monitoring report. For this comparison, the central buying question is whether that wider scope is useful to the organization. Profound's current brand plans consist of a limited trial and a tailored Enterprise offer. The trial runs a recommended prompt set for a short period and does not provide the same customization, history, exports, or API access as ongoing enterprise usage. Profound is therefore best considered by brands planning a sustained AI search and marketing program, with the monitoring scope and agent usage agreed in the proposal.
Prompt coverage and platform selection
Peec AI's Starter package includes a selected set of three models, with capacity expanding through larger prompt plans and optional model additions. OtterlyAI's entry package has fewer prompts but names four included engines; other supported engines are separate purchases. Profound's brand trial samples three platforms for a limited period, while Enterprise supports a tailored set. These are different ways of packaging observation. A company monitoring a handful of high-value questions may find OtterlyAI's entry scope sufficient, while a team organizing a larger topic set may prefer Peec's prompt structure. Profound is better assessed against an ongoing enterprise brief. More engines do not automatically compensate for a poorly chosen prompt set.
Understanding mentions and the sources behind them
Peec AI emphasizes visibility, competitive position, sentiment, and source-level analysis in a shared analytics workspace. OtterlyAI connects brand reporting and link citation analysis with audits that help turn observations into page-level work. Profound combines Answer Engine Insights with additional demand and traffic research, giving teams more kinds of evidence around the answer itself. In our view, Peec is particularly useful for a team asking where and why competitors appear, OtterlyAI for a team wanting a focused monitoring-and-audit routine, and Profound for a team linking answer coverage to a wider research program. A citation, a brand mention, and a website visit are different signals; each product's reports should be read with that distinction intact.
Reporting and turning findings into work
Peec AI offers shared access and opportunities informed by source and visibility gaps, with reporting depth depending on the package. OtterlyAI adds reporting connectors and programmatic access on higher plans, making it useful when monitoring must feed a broader reporting process. Profound's AI Marketer and reusable agents extend further into producing marketing work using brand context. The practical comparison is the amount of workflow a team wants in the same product. Peec can support regular analysis and prioritization; OtterlyAI can support recurring tracking, audits, and reporting; Profound can connect those insights with a wider production environment. None of these capabilities guarantees that an AI engine will mention a brand or send traffic.
Plans, prices, and trial boundaries
The table contains the checked prices and billing intervals. Peec publishes monthly prompt-based plans and an annual discount. OtterlyAI publishes a smaller Lite tier, larger monitoring tiers, and paid model additions. Profound's current brand offer uses a limited trial followed by a custom Enterprise proposal. Do not carry older Profound self-serve prices into this comparison. For all three, compare prompt capacity, engine coverage, history, and export access alongside the recurring fee.
Which AI visibility tool should you choose?
Choose Peec AI for a shared view of brand, competitor, and source performance. Choose OtterlyAI for a focused monitoring program with an accessible small-prompt entry and built-in audits. Choose Profound when answer visibility is part of a broader enterprise marketing workflow. The right scope starts with the questions and platforms your prospective customers actually use.
Sources & methodology
This article uses vendor documentation and our editorial analysis. We have not performed a controlled hands-on test. Product facts were checked on Sep 29, 2026; each profile records its own verification date.