The decision desk

AI music stem separation: LALAL.AI vs Moises vs Fadr

Compare LALAL.AI, Moises, and Fadr for isolating vocals and instruments, practicing individual parts, and exporting stems into a music workflow.

By AIPicksy EditorialUpdated Sep 28, 20265 min readSource-based editorial

Our take

LALAL.AI focuses on extraction, Moises connects separation with rehearsal tools, and Fadr offers free downloadable basic stems plus remix and production features.

The quick difference

3 tools, at a glance

Start with the fit. Read the individual breakdowns below before choosing. Scroll the table on smaller screens.

Product strengths and trade-offs
ToolBest fitMain strengthsWhat to check
LALAL.AIProducers needing focused stem extraction, batch processing, and optional DAW access.Vocal, lead/backing, and instrument separation · Batch processing on paid plans · Pro VST plugin, API access, and local desktop processingFree Starter previews do not include result downloads.
MoisesMusicians isolating parts for rehearsal, backing tracks, and production.Custom vocal and instrument separation · Speed controls, chord detection, and smart metronome · Pro Hi-Fi processing and more detailed instrument groupsFree files are limited to five minutes.
FadrMusicians and remixers who want downloadable stems alongside remix controls.Free basic vocal, drum, bass, and melody stems · MIDI, key, tempo, and chord detection · Plus individual stems, WAV exports, and Stems PluginIndividual drum and melody parts require Plus.
Compare pricing, features, and source dates

Prices describe the named plan, not total cost. Different billing units are not directly equivalent. Scroll the table horizontally on smaller screens.

Side-by-side facts from the current product profiles
At a glanceLALAL.AIVendor documentationMoisesVendor documentationFadrVendor documentation
Consider it forProducers needing focused stem extraction, batch processing, and optional DAW access.Musicians isolating parts for rehearsal, backing tracks, and production.Musicians and remixers who want downloadable stems alongside remix controls.
Named plan / entry pointLite €6.75/month annually
EUR/month, billed annually
Paid price unconfirmed
subscription
Plus $10/month
USD/month
Free optionAvailableAvailableAvailable
Documented features
  • Vocal, lead/backing, and instrument separation
  • Batch processing on paid plans
  • Pro VST plugin, API access, and local desktop processing
  • Custom vocal and instrument separation
  • Speed controls, chord detection, and smart metronome
  • Pro Hi-Fi processing and more detailed instrument groups
  • Free basic vocal, drum, bass, and melody stems
  • MIDI, key, tempo, and chord detection
  • Plus individual stems, WAV exports, and Stems Plugin
Limitations
  • Free Starter previews do not include result downloads.
  • Fast Queue usage multiplies duration by separation types selected.
  • Free files are limited to five minutes.
  • Paid pricing requires login; exact amounts are unconfirmed.
  • Individual drum and melody parts require Plus.
  • API consumption is separately metered.
IntegrationsCheck the official product documentationCheck the official product documentationCheck the official product documentation
Billing detailsThe checked page displays Lite at €6.75/month (€81 annually) and Pro at €13.50/month (€162 annually). Lite includes 90 Fast Queue minutes/month; Pro includes 250. Both have unlimited Relaxed Queue processing and 2GB files. Starter is free with 10 preview minutes, 200MB files, and no downloads. Fast minutes do not roll over; queue selection switches automatically after the fast allowance.Free access offers limited monthly uploads and five-minute files. Premium and Pro support files up to 20 minutes. Current documentation lists Premium custom separation up to six tracks including Others; Pro allows unrestricted selection among supported groups with Hi-Fi quality. Some newer stems are web-only. Pricing redirects to login, so current paid amounts and billing intervals were not confirmed.Fadr Basic is free with unlimited basic stems and MP3 downloads. Plus is $10/month or $100/year, adding detailed stems, lossless WAV downloads, the Stems Plugin, and unlimited storage. The API requires Plus and meters stem tasks separately at $0.05/audio minute; subscription API credits have their own cap. Promotional banners are not used as the standard recurring price.
Last checkedSep 28, 2026
Official source
Sep 28, 2026
Official source
Sep 28, 2026
Official source

LALAL.AI

LALAL.AI is a focused extraction service for people starting with a mixed recording. Its tools separate vocals and instruments, including lead and backing vocal parts, so a producer can work with a specific component without having the original recording session. The web workflow supports audio and video files, while paid batch processing is useful when several recordings need similar treatment. The Pro offering adds a VST plugin, API access, and local processing in the desktop app, giving it a route into more established production workflows. Its pricing introduces an important operational distinction between priority processing and a slower queue: paid plans include an allowance of fast processing followed by unlimited relaxed processing. Selecting additional separation types affects the minutes consumed. LALAL.AI is a sensible candidate when the desired output is an extracted file for another application. Free Starter access is primarily a way to hear previews; the checked plan comparison does not include result downloads on that tier.

Moises

Moises places stem separation within a musician's everyday practice and creation workflow. After separating a recording, a player can mute the part they want to perform, listen closely to another instrument, change playback speed, and use chord or metronome assistance. That makes it particularly relevant to guitarists, bassists, drummers, singers, and teachers who need a useful rehearsal environment rather than only a downloaded file. Custom separation lets paid users choose among available vocal and instrument groups. Premium has a selection limit, while Pro expands the options and uses Hi-Fi processing, including more detailed drum and instrument groups. The available combinations matter: several alternative splits of the same instrument group cannot necessarily be selected together. Some newer options are currently documented as web-only. Moises also has a free tier with limited uploads and shorter files. Its public pricing entry redirects to login, so the paid amount cannot be responsibly inferred from older comparison posts.

Fadr

Fadr combines stem extraction with tools for remixing and understanding a song. Its free Basic offer separates the main vocal, drum, bass, and melody components and allows MP3 downloads, which makes it useful even before a subscription decision. MIDI detection, key and tempo information, and a remix maker extend the workflow beyond listening to isolated tracks. Plus adds more detailed vocal, drum, and melodic parts, lossless WAV exports, and a Stems Plugin for use in a digital audio workstation. This is an appealing combination for someone who wants to take a recording apart and then use the pieces in a new arrangement or production session. Unlike a preview-only free service, the Basic output can move into another application. The paid distinction is mainly about finer separation and production features. Fadr also offers an API, but its metered processing is a separate consideration from ordinary use of the web subscription.

Extraction, rehearsal, or remixing

LALAL.AI centers the extraction step: select the material to isolate and obtain files for another part of the production process. Moises adds playback and practice controls around the separated recording, making it a stronger conceptual fit for learning a part or rehearsing with an accompaniment. Fadr connects stems with remixing, MIDI detection, and song information. A drummer preparing a rehearsal track may appreciate Moises' surrounding tools more than a separate extraction service. A producer gathering several isolated parts for a session may prefer LALAL.AI's focused workflow, while someone experimenting with a remix can get practical value from Fadr's combined toolset.

Detailed instrument control

The paid offerings in all three products go beyond a simple vocal-and-instrumental split, but their groupings differ. LALAL.AI offers dedicated instrument and lead/backing extraction choices. Moises documents custom track selection with different Premium and Pro boundaries, including detailed drum components in Pro. Fadr Plus exposes separate vocal, drum, and melody instruments alongside its basic stems. The right choice depends on the actual part needed: a combined drum track is different from a kick or snare stem, just as a complete guitar part differs from an acoustic/electric split. This is a comparison of documented controls, not a claim that one model produces cleaner audio on every recording.

Free output and production handoff

Fadr's recurring Basic plan includes downloadable MP3 stems, making it the clearest starting point here for someone who needs usable files without a subscription. LALAL.AI's free Starter tier provides previews without downloads, so it serves a different purpose. Moises offers limited free processing within its musician-focused environment, with more advanced separation and longer files on paid plans. For workstation use, LALAL.AI reserves its VST option for Pro, while Fadr includes its Stems Plugin in Plus. A musician mainly practicing inside Moises may not need that plugin route. Match the output destination to the plan rather than comparing the word free in isolation.

Minutes, subscriptions, and plan limits

LALAL.AI distinguishes Fast Queue allowances from unlimited Relaxed Queue processing, with selected separation types affecting minute consumption. Fadr publishes a straightforward Plus subscription for its app features, while API use is separately metered. Moises confirms free and paid feature boundaries but requires login to see the current paid price. The table keeps that amount unconfirmed and records the checked LALAL.AI prices in euros. Different currencies, queue rules, and export permissions make a single cheapest-plan ranking misleading.

Which should you choose?

Choose LALAL.AI for a focused extraction workflow and its higher-tier production access. Choose Moises when practicing, learning, and changing playback are part of the same job as separation. Choose Fadr for free downloadable basic stems or a remix-oriented subscription with WAV and plugin features. In each case, the useful comparison starts with the instrument and output you actually need.

Sources & methodology

This article uses vendor documentation and our editorial analysis. We have not performed a controlled hands-on test. Product facts were checked on Sep 28, 2026; each profile records its own verification date.

How we evaluate tools · Suggest a correction

Explore the tools in this guide

LALAL.AI

AI extraction of vocals and individual instruments from existing audio and video recordings.

✓ Free optionLite €6.75/month annually

Moises

AI stem separation with practice controls, chord detection, and cross-device music workflows.

✓ Free optionPaid price unconfirmed

Fadr

AI music separation with MIDI detection, remix tools, and a DAW stem plugin.

✓ Free optionPlus $10/month

Keep exploring

All articles
0 tools selected for comparison
AI music stem separation: LALAL.AI vs Moises vs Fadr | AIPicksy