AI horse gait video: Sleip vs Stride vs Horscan

Choose the movement record you need

A horse can move differently between appointments, making a consistent video record useful for owners and equine professionals. Sleip, Stride and Horscan all analyze movement without attaching sensors, but their outputs and sharing models differ. This comparison concerns video-based gait assessment, rather than riding-route tracking or livestock health wearables. Measurements support professional interpretation; they do not establish a diagnosis.

Sleip

Sleip uses computer vision to locate anatomical points while a horse trots, then applies biomechanical calculations to describe asymmetry. The report combines a gait summary, stride curves and slow-motion video, so the number remains connected to the movement that produced it. Trends and shared reports make it suitable for a practice following a horse across several visits.

The distinction between Pro Vet and management Pro matters. Pro Vet provides head, trunk and pelvis data, diagnostic-analgesia tags and clinical interpretation support. Management Pro has a different scope, including head and pelvis measurements. Trunk data is specifically reserved for veterinary users, rather than being a universal feature of every subscription.

Remote lets invited people record through a limited app, while Desktop brings horse and invitation management into a browser. Both are add-ons. Sleip therefore fits a clinician coordinating recordings and longitudinal records, especially when data access and capture responsibilities extend beyond one appointment.

Stride Equine Gait Analysis

Stride Equine Gait Analysis by Quentin Pleyers takes an explicitly local approach: motion analysis runs on the device. An iPhone or iPad can process recordings without a connection, making the app relevant in barns and fields where uploading a video is inconvenient. Its .stride format packages video, measurements and results for transfer between an owner and a professional.

The current free edition needs careful interpretation. Newer release notes describe a color-based symmetry view and free .stride export, qualifying older listing text that groups exports under subscriptions. Plus adds trend and comparison tools; Pro adds a professional database, clinical notes, detailed metrics and imported client analyses.

The product site also describes timeline comparison, limb-phase information, report exports and iCloud backup. Those features make Stride more than a single visual alert, although the relevant paid entitlement should be checked in the current purchase screen. This is the stride.ac product, separate from similarly named horse-management services.

Horscan

Horscan combines uploaded gait video with a horse diary, files, a calendar and shared access. It tracks side-view walking and trotting footage, returning movement charts and potential anomaly alerts. Owners can give a trainer or veterinarian view-only access, or permit editing and new analyses, so the movement record sits beside everyday care information.

The free tier covers one horse and three analyses each month with a General view. Basic adds the Bobbing view and history, while Premium adds leg-amplitude and joint-angle views, comparison and PDF downloads. Paying more therefore changes the detail of the analysis as well as the number of recordings and horses.

Horscan suits owners who want an ongoing shared record rather than a standalone clinical export utility. Its published filming instructions require a side-on view with the whole horse visible, and the current gait page limits analysis to walk and trot. Canter is still described as development work, so it should not drive a purchase today.

Sleip vs Stride vs Horscan: data and capture

Sleip centers the workflow on trot asymmetry and distinguishes veterinary trunk data from management data. Stride emphasizes device-local processing and exchangeable analysis files. Horscan connects walk/trot observations to an owner-facing horse record. Those are meaningful differences even though all three start with ordinary video.

For a clinic needing diagnostic-analgesia tags and remotely collected recordings, Sleip has the clearest named workflow. Stride is attractive when offline processing and later file transfer matter. Horscan is attractive when the person recording also maintains the horse diary and needs straightforward shared access.

Sharing and longitudinal comparison

Sleip offers trends, PDF or link sharing, plus separately purchased Remote and Desktop functions. Stride bundles analysis into a transferable file and exposes richer histories and comparisons through paid editions. Horscan shares a horse profile with permission levels and reserves history comparison/PDF output for Premium.

The practical choice is where the continuing record should live. Sleip organizes a practice-facing measurement history, Stride can move complete records between devices and professionals, and Horscan keeps movement alongside daily notes. None of those sharing models makes measurements from different systems automatically interchangeable.

Compare the charged plan, not just the entry price

Sleip publishes separate Pro Vet and management prices, with extra-device and workflow add-ons. Stride has free core analysis but separates Plus and professional entitlements; some store purchase rows lack explicit durations. Horscan publishes monthly Basic and Premium allowances and charges for additional depth through the plan structure.

Use the table for verified rates and unresolved billing details. An advertised annual monthly equivalent is not a monthly payment. Likewise, Stride's introductory access, Sleip's trial and Horscan's recurring free allowance describe different ways to start, rather than equivalent free professional packages.

Which should you choose?

Choose Sleip for a veterinary practice building a structured asymmetry history with remote capture. Choose Stride when offline processing and a complete transferable file are central. Choose Horscan when routine horse management and shared owner records matter most, selecting the plan that actually exposes the desired movement views.